M-SON IP

© Copyright 2025; M-Son - All Rights Reserved

Patent analysis by subject matter experts VS sophisticated tools

Summary of the comparison

The first step of subject matter based patent analysis for any patent research project is removing irrelevant references which we refer to as “patent filtering”. In this exercise, we have selected a sample from the results displayed by the automated tool after querying it for internet connected vehicles. Our subject matter experts then reviewed those results to filter out irrelevant references. This analysis is used to show the difference between analysis conducted by the subject matter experts Vs the results displayed by the automated tools.

Search results displayed by automated tool queried for internet connected vehicles

Tool displayed around “184898”hits when searched for internet connected vehicle in Title, Abstract & Claim between 1997 to 2020.

Comparison Table

The table shows the comparison of subject matter expert based analysis Vs the results displayed by the automated tools for top 30 assignees (current owner)

My Table

Rank displayed by automated tool

Rank by subject matter experts

Current Owner

Hits displayed by automated tool

Hits after reviewed by subject matter experts

Reduction %

1

2

TOYOTA GROUP

2597

958

63%

2

1

SAMSUNG GROUP

2117

1191

44%

3

3

HYUNDAI MOTOR GROUP

1901

708

63%

4

9

LG CORP

1347

329

76%

5

4

PORSCHE SE

1338

626

53%

6

8

DENSO CORP

1122

396

65%

7

13

STATE GRID CORP OF CHINA

1084

282

74%

8

16

HITACHI GROUP

1079

248

77%

9

12

MITSUBISHI GROUP

1060

287

73%

10

7

ROBERT BOSCH GMBH

977

438

55%

11

5

FORD MOTOR CO

972

615

37%

12

27

HUAWEI INVESTMENT & HOLDING CO LTD

915

182

80%

13

6

GENERAL MOTORS CO

871

584

33%

14

15

HONDA MOTOR CO LTD

858

273

68%

15

11

PANASONIC HOLDING CORP

845

288

66%

16

21

SUMITOMO GROUP

810

221

73%

17

18

QUALCOMM INC

782

231

70%

18

24

NANJING UNIV

750

207

72%

19

47

STATE COUNCIL OF THE PEOPLES REPUBLIC OF CHINA

701

107

85%

20

22

PSA GROUP

574

217

62%

21

10

SCHAEFFLER GROUP

543

298

45%

22

17

BAIDU INC

536

239

55%

23

19

BMW AG

533

224

58%

24

31

DAIMLER AG

500

160

68%

25

42

SHANGHAI UNIV

471

124

74%

26

>100

SZ DJI TECHNOLOGY CO LTD

468

27

94%

27

66

TOSHIBA CORP

457

78

83%

28

14

IBM CORP

456

275

40%

29

20

ZHEJIANG GEELY HOLDING GROUP CO LTD

456

222

51%

30

33

NISSAN MOTOR CO LTD

447

144

68%

Insights

• Toyota holding the top position with 2597 references according to automated tool comes down to the second position with 958 references after the same data set is analyzed by M-Son IP's subject matter experts. Hence, we can also see 63% reduction in references when compared to the results displayed by automated tools.
• Samsung holding the second position with 2117 references according to automated tool comes climbs up to the first position with 1191 records as per M-Son IP's analysis. Hence, we can also see there is a 44% reduction in the data set produced by automated tools.
• LG Patents has a 76% reduction and also its rank based on count is dropped from 4th to 9th.
• Huawei slipped down to 27th from 12th with a reduction of 80% after filtering.

Conclusion

The above table shows how unfiltered/raw data produced by automated tools can have a bad impact if a company is making any decisions on the data directly generated from patent databases or other sources without removing the traffic of patents.

USA Office

6225 N Talman Ave, Chicago, IL 60659, USA

+1 (708) 406 6059

INDIA Office

16-8-651, 2nd Floor, New Malakpet, Hyderabad, Telangana, 500024

+91-988-503-4635